To be fully honest, I still think that Pierce is more ideal for attackers than deniers for they are meant to deal damage without being stopped by any pesky defense stuff, but Pierce Denial has some great potential in the meta. PEP + Trait Protection might be a problem, though. She can do her My Favorite Trick and stupidly cleanses everything out, like everything. Unlike Pierce Attack, Pierce Denial has a counter. Because relics have created more anti-thetys. But he’s more than a fighter: He also offers counsel to people. Now yes, shes easy to rank up because the team shop, but now, I can go, vs a level 130 Thetys, and win. What if a denier already has Pierce as a trait or a status caster? Couldn't be better than the given Pierce. Monster Legends Wiki Ever since Kihaku made a massive dragon emerge from nothingness and destroy his enemies, no one questions his power. The Freeze Immunity might be a problem, but anyway, this isn't only about her. She doesn't even need to do her extra turn skills and immediately do her Abyss Bottom. Imagine, a move like this: Ally Turn Transfer + Pierce, and then, given to a late and powerful Legendary denier like Warmaster Thalassa. Pierce Denial sounds too powerful that it might guarantee a win. I haven't seen any gimmicks as I've mentioned. As dangerous as it may seem, what if Pierce status effect is given to a denier? Is it more powerful than Pierce Attack? Pierce is known for its usage to deal damage to the opponents, like, you can just ignore every defensive effect from the enemies and, then, kill them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |